Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Film: The Queen of Versailles (Lauren Greenfield, USA, 2012)



This documentary was one of four films that I saw at the first ever Sundance London, which offered a column of 14 features (plus some shorts programs, panels and music) hand-selected from the American inceptive. Both documentaries were amazing (I also saw the insanely well-sourced and devastatingly expansive-in-scope The House I Live In) and both fiction films were kind of limp (For Ellen and Nobody Walks) and I am resisting the urge to declare that experience a cross-section of America's current indie exports. All I will say is is this: goddamn documentaries are getting good. And fiction is good too of course, but is it getting better?

Given the nature of the times, this could be the last great film to epitomize American consumption and excess. The film's becoming is amazing in itself, begun years ago as a portrait of the dynastic Segal family, who were then breaking ground on what would be the biggest house in the country. Then everything went tits up. The crash of 2008 hit and their timeshare empire, built mostly on leveraged finances, began to implode. One asset however, began paying off: the great documentarian gift of rapport. If Greenfield ever intended to capture their twisted value systems or morosely distasteful lifestyle choices, that slant never seemed to percolate. She filmed without judgement and they dug being able to make gregarious displays of wealth while simultaneously displaying their “human side.” And they became close. And as the family's lives began to erode, the show was allowed to go on, ending quite close to the date of its release.

If only all tycoons were such good sports. It helped that they might have thought we'd fancy them martyrs. Sometimes that may have been true, but in other cases one man's harrowing is another's morbidly hilarious. See: 1) Their attempts to fly commercial after losing their private jet. 2) Their attempts manage herds of exotic pets, defecating all over their increasingly filthy house – if not already too malnourished (or dead) to do so – and no domestic staff left to help them. The poignancy of all this, claims the filmmaker, is that this model of unsustainable living pertains to everyone in the first-world, just in varying levels of scale. No one, of course, would want to watch this happen to a middle class family. However, display a collapse narrative in truly operatic proportions, and it becomes compulsively watchable on many levels. And it's not just the thrill of seeing such superficial giants fall from the beanstalk.

There were probably endless opportunities to make the Segals look ridiculous and the family's deficit of self-consciousness would probably leave them oblivious to it all. Instead many choices were made that might evoke the family's softer side. Perhaps because they were too easy a target. Perhaps it was her documentarian duty to layer even grotesque displays of decadence with ambiguity. Cut to: INT. THE SEGAL'S GIGANTIC-FUCK-OFF TOWER IN DOWNTOWN VEGAS: The company's heir is galvanizing his sales team with all the fervor of a vacuum cleaner salesman: “We're saving lives here. The research is in, people who go on vacation live longer.” Is this the menacing plasticity of their industry? Or the stories they're telling themselves to morally justify their expansion? Cut to: the impressive and affordable digs that seem to blindside their very working class clients. Are they at least trying to be good? Cut to: David, the Segal patriarch and company's proprietor: “Yeah I guess I shouldn't have sold all our timeshares on a mortgage basis to any schmuck with bad credit because now I'm completely enslaved to the banks.” Are they victims too? Cut to: matriarch Jackie Segal selling off her extra things (well some of her very hefty amount extra things) for almost nothing in the husk of their disbanded department store. Is she really trying to cut material weight?

Regardless, I found myself cheering for them. We find Jackie revealing herself as, well, rather revealing. Her shamelessness, innocence and candidacy are almost disarming. She quickly becomes the anchor of the film, maintaining a certain consistency of temperament as our protagonist. Of course, it later becomes apparent that her charmed life may have deprived her of the emotional software to be anything but. On pace with our attachment to Jackie, is our detachment from David as he declines on every level, completely absorbed in salvaging his ruined fortress. The third act is a sad, but all-too-expected witness to Jackie's impotence in dealing with real-life family drama. David's familial drives wither and Jackie is utterly lost, not at all used to these brand new sewers of struggle and tension.

Ultimately, the characters are in themselves about as interesting as carbon, nitrogen and phosporous, but like all good educational shows on outer space, the way those ingredients behave during a supernova is riveting. The film captures such a cosmic weave of family, economics, and all the consumptive sludge you can pile on top of it with real energy and vibrancy. Its narrative pace would ensnare those on the strictest of Hollywood fiction diets. One casualty of this is occasionally feeling waylaid by segues into the real lives of the maids and surrounding people affected by the crisis. I felt guilty considering such elemental doc material like that a bit superfluous, but it's hard not to let your expectations get tainted by the fireworks show at center stage. You can't help yourself: it's a genre film with all the thrills of the“I-can't-believe-this-is-actually-happening” factor. This is an especially powerful combination to frame all the obscenities of lifestyle that the American one-percenters seem to so generously provide. And the ability of Greenfield to deliver this material with narrative precision impresses me in ways that fiction filmmaking hasn't seemed to lately. But it's the moments that you just can't find in fiction. Moments that could only burst out of such a fevered and thoroughly-filmed system of excess. (I dare Terry Gilliam to conceive of something more cartoonish than a Segal shopping spree...and this is after the crash).

No comments:

Post a Comment